The process of metaplasia is not dependent on the loss of

The process of metaplasia is not dependent on the loss of Notch1. Our in vitro get AZ876 results further highlight the intrinsic defect of the corneal epithelium. We focused specifically on tight junctions and found that loss of Notch1 in cultured corneal epithelial cells led to an impairment in tight junction formation. This most likely reflects a more fundamental impairment in the differentiation program and not a specific defect involving the tight junctions.Notch1 and Corneal Epithelial BarrierThe expression and organization of tight junctions is a highly regulated process that is directed by the differentiation program. Factors such as increased calcium and air-lifting which promote differentiation and stratification also promote tight junction formation. Therefore, we believe that loss of Notch1 is probably not directly affecting tight junctions but rather causing a defect in epithelial differentiation, which also includes formation of tight junctions. A similar defect in tight junction formation was also reported in the 14-3-3 knockout mice which develop an identical corneal phenotype [41]. Interestingly, the tight junction defect in 14-3-3 knockout epithelial cells was reversed upon transfection with Notch1IC [41]. Further Pluripotin web studies are needed to determine the precise mechanism by which loss of Notch1 leads to impairment of the epithelial differentiation program. Previously, the phenotype of conditional Notch1-/- mice was partly characterized by Vauclair et al. [14] In particular, they demonstrated the critical role of corneal trauma from eyelids in the development of keratinization. As we have shown in this study, the barrier impairment after trauma precedes the complete loss of meibomian glands and therefore while the eyelid pathology is significant in the progression of the phenotype, it is not required for the barrier defect we observed after wounding. We believe that trauma from normal blinking can stress the epithelium which is further exacerbated by the loss of meibomian glands and eyelid margin keratinization. A recently published study has reported that loss of Notch function on the ocular surface leads to impaired conjunctival goblet cell differentiation and progressive atrophy of the lacrimal gland [24]. The authors hypothesized that the corneal pathology was secondary to the absence of goblet cell and the aqueous tear deficiency. We did not observe such changes in our mice. As mentioned earlier, we have actually found enhanced aqueous tear production in our conditional Notch1-/mice. This may be either reflexive tearing due to impaired epithelial barrier or perhaps due to the loss of the meibomian gland function which destabilizes the tear film. The difference between our results and Zhang et al. is most likely due to our use of different mouse models. Specifically, most of their reported findings are with a mouse model that expresses a dominant negative mastermind-like1 (dnMaml1) which inhibits all canonical Notch signaling [42] compared to our study where only Notch1 is knocked out. Although Zhang et al. do report using a conditional Notch1 knockout model for some of their experiments, they used a different driver mouse (K14-rtTA/TC and tet-O-Cre) and also deleted Notch1 much earlier by giving doxycycline from P1 to P16, a time when the cornea and ocular surface are still under development [24,43]. In contrast, we deleted Notch1 using K14-Cre-ERT by administering tamoxifen after 2 months of age. Overall, the pathology reported.The process of metaplasia is not dependent on the loss of Notch1. Our in vitro results further highlight the intrinsic defect of the corneal epithelium. We focused specifically on tight junctions and found that loss of Notch1 in cultured corneal epithelial cells led to an impairment in tight junction formation. This most likely reflects a more fundamental impairment in the differentiation program and not a specific defect involving the tight junctions.Notch1 and Corneal Epithelial BarrierThe expression and organization of tight junctions is a highly regulated process that is directed by the differentiation program. Factors such as increased calcium and air-lifting which promote differentiation and stratification also promote tight junction formation. Therefore, we believe that loss of Notch1 is probably not directly affecting tight junctions but rather causing a defect in epithelial differentiation, which also includes formation of tight junctions. A similar defect in tight junction formation was also reported in the 14-3-3 knockout mice which develop an identical corneal phenotype [41]. Interestingly, the tight junction defect in 14-3-3 knockout epithelial cells was reversed upon transfection with Notch1IC [41]. Further studies are needed to determine the precise mechanism by which loss of Notch1 leads to impairment of the epithelial differentiation program. Previously, the phenotype of conditional Notch1-/- mice was partly characterized by Vauclair et al. [14] In particular, they demonstrated the critical role of corneal trauma from eyelids in the development of keratinization. As we have shown in this study, the barrier impairment after trauma precedes the complete loss of meibomian glands and therefore while the eyelid pathology is significant in the progression of the phenotype, it is not required for the barrier defect we observed after wounding. We believe that trauma from normal blinking can stress the epithelium which is further exacerbated by the loss of meibomian glands and eyelid margin keratinization. A recently published study has reported that loss of Notch function on the ocular surface leads to impaired conjunctival goblet cell differentiation and progressive atrophy of the lacrimal gland [24]. The authors hypothesized that the corneal pathology was secondary to the absence of goblet cell and the aqueous tear deficiency. We did not observe such changes in our mice. As mentioned earlier, we have actually found enhanced aqueous tear production in our conditional Notch1-/mice. This may be either reflexive tearing due to impaired epithelial barrier or perhaps due to the loss of the meibomian gland function which destabilizes the tear film. The difference between our results and Zhang et al. is most likely due to our use of different mouse models. Specifically, most of their reported findings are with a mouse model that expresses a dominant negative mastermind-like1 (dnMaml1) which inhibits all canonical Notch signaling [42] compared to our study where only Notch1 is knocked out. Although Zhang et al. do report using a conditional Notch1 knockout model for some of their experiments, they used a different driver mouse (K14-rtTA/TC and tet-O-Cre) and also deleted Notch1 much earlier by giving doxycycline from P1 to P16, a time when the cornea and ocular surface are still under development [24,43]. In contrast, we deleted Notch1 using K14-Cre-ERT by administering tamoxifen after 2 months of age. Overall, the pathology reported.