Molds that would precisely mimic the normal anatomy of the patient-specific

Molds that would precisely mimic the normal anatomy of the patient-specific external ear as well as recapitulate the complex biomechanical properties of native auricular elastic 307538-42-7 web cartilage while avoiding the morbidity of traditional autologous reconstructions.Methods Ethics StatementAll animal care and experimental procedures were in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [15] and were approved by the Weill Cornell Medical College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol # 20110036). All efforts were made to minimize suffering.Isolation of chondrocytesBovine auricular chondrocytes were isolated as previously described [16]. Briefly, ears were obtained from freshly slaughtered 1? day old calves (Gold Medal Packing, Oriskany, NY). Auricular cartilage was sharply dissected from the surrounding skin and perichondrium under sterile conditions. Cartilage was diced into 1 mm3 pieces and digested overnight in 0.3 collagenase, 100 mg/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). The following day, the cells were filtered, washed, and counted.Construct design and mold fabricationMolds for the generation of ear constructs were designed from digital images of human ears obtained from three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry. High-resolution images of the ear of a five year-old female were obtained using a Cyberware Rapid 3D Digitizer (3030 Digitizer, Monterey, CA). By confining the scan to the region of the ear, approximately a 1662274 15u arc centered on the ear, the geometry of the MedChemExpress JW 74 auricle was obtained to within a resolution of 15 mm in approximately 60 seconds. These images were subsequently processed using PlyEdit software (Cyberware, Inc., Monterey, CA), first to remove digital noise and subsequently edited to produce an image with a continuous surface (Figure 1). These images were converted to stereolithography (.STL) files using Studio 4.0 (Geomagic, Morrisville, NC) and imported into SolidWorks (Dassault Systems Corp, Waltham, MA). The imageFigure 1. Digitization process for human ears. The anatomy of a 5 year-old female was scanned (A, D), processed to remove noise (B, E), and digitally sculpted to obtain the appropriate curvature for the anterior portion of the ear (C, F). Sagittal (A ) and worm’s-eye (D ) views. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056506.gTissue Engineering of Patient-Specific Auriclesof the 3D ear was embedded into a virtual block to cavity, which was used to design a 7-part mold using the part feature in SolidWorks (Figure 2). Each of the mold parts was printed out of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic using a Stratasys FDM 2000 3D printer (Eden Prairie, MN). Prior to use, all molds were sterilized by washing with LysolH (Parsippany, NJ) followed by a 1-hour soak in 70 ethanol that was allowed to evaporate for 30 minutes in a sterile biological safety cabinet.Implant fabricationCollagen for implant molding was extracted and reconstituted as 18204824 previously described [17,18]. Briefly, tendons were excised from 7? month-old mixed gender Sprague rat-tails and suspended in 0.1 acetic acid at 150 mL/gram of tendon for at least 48 hours at 4uC. The collagen solution was centrifuged for 90 minutes at 4500 RPM at 4uC. The clear supernatant was then collected and lyophilized, and the pellet was discarded. The collagen was reconstituted as a stock solution of 20 mg/mL collagen in 0.1 acetic acid. The stock collagen solution was returned to pH 7.0 and mainta.Molds that would precisely mimic the normal anatomy of the patient-specific external ear as well as recapitulate the complex biomechanical properties of native auricular elastic cartilage while avoiding the morbidity of traditional autologous reconstructions.Methods Ethics StatementAll animal care and experimental procedures were in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [15] and were approved by the Weill Cornell Medical College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol # 20110036). All efforts were made to minimize suffering.Isolation of chondrocytesBovine auricular chondrocytes were isolated as previously described [16]. Briefly, ears were obtained from freshly slaughtered 1? day old calves (Gold Medal Packing, Oriskany, NY). Auricular cartilage was sharply dissected from the surrounding skin and perichondrium under sterile conditions. Cartilage was diced into 1 mm3 pieces and digested overnight in 0.3 collagenase, 100 mg/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). The following day, the cells were filtered, washed, and counted.Construct design and mold fabricationMolds for the generation of ear constructs were designed from digital images of human ears obtained from three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry. High-resolution images of the ear of a five year-old female were obtained using a Cyberware Rapid 3D Digitizer (3030 Digitizer, Monterey, CA). By confining the scan to the region of the ear, approximately a 1662274 15u arc centered on the ear, the geometry of the auricle was obtained to within a resolution of 15 mm in approximately 60 seconds. These images were subsequently processed using PlyEdit software (Cyberware, Inc., Monterey, CA), first to remove digital noise and subsequently edited to produce an image with a continuous surface (Figure 1). These images were converted to stereolithography (.STL) files using Studio 4.0 (Geomagic, Morrisville, NC) and imported into SolidWorks (Dassault Systems Corp, Waltham, MA). The imageFigure 1. Digitization process for human ears. The anatomy of a 5 year-old female was scanned (A, D), processed to remove noise (B, E), and digitally sculpted to obtain the appropriate curvature for the anterior portion of the ear (C, F). Sagittal (A ) and worm’s-eye (D ) views. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056506.gTissue Engineering of Patient-Specific Auriclesof the 3D ear was embedded into a virtual block to cavity, which was used to design a 7-part mold using the part feature in SolidWorks (Figure 2). Each of the mold parts was printed out of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic using a Stratasys FDM 2000 3D printer (Eden Prairie, MN). Prior to use, all molds were sterilized by washing with LysolH (Parsippany, NJ) followed by a 1-hour soak in 70 ethanol that was allowed to evaporate for 30 minutes in a sterile biological safety cabinet.Implant fabricationCollagen for implant molding was extracted and reconstituted as 18204824 previously described [17,18]. Briefly, tendons were excised from 7? month-old mixed gender Sprague rat-tails and suspended in 0.1 acetic acid at 150 mL/gram of tendon for at least 48 hours at 4uC. The collagen solution was centrifuged for 90 minutes at 4500 RPM at 4uC. The clear supernatant was then collected and lyophilized, and the pellet was discarded. The collagen was reconstituted as a stock solution of 20 mg/mL collagen in 0.1 acetic acid. The stock collagen solution was returned to pH 7.0 and mainta.