Homozygotes who did not chew betel nut

Homozygotes who did not chew betel nut 1516647 (Table 3). Similarly, among 461 betel-quid consumers, subjects with VEGF-C polymorphic rs3775194, rs11947611 or rs7664413, genes and who smoked had corresponding risks of 2.695- (95 CI: 1.270,10.750), 8.066- (95 CI: 2.250,28.913), and 18.100-fold (95 CI: 5.427,60.369) of having oral cancer compared to betelquid chewers with the WT gene who did not smoke (Table 4). In light of the above results, we suggest that VEGF-C gene polymorphisms have a strong impact on oral-cancer susceptibility in betel-nut and/or smoking consumers. We further explored the haplotypes to evaluate the combined effect of the five polymorphisms on oral-cancer susceptibility. The distribution frequencies of VEGF-C rs3775194, rs11947611,Table 1. Distributions of demographic characteristics in 426 controls and 470 male patients with oral cancer.Variable Betel nut chewing No Yes Alcohol Gracillin chemical information consumption No Yes Tobacco use No YesControls (N = 426)Patients (N = 470)Odds ratio (95 confidence interval)p value336 (78.9 ) 90 (21.1 )99 (21.1 ) 371 (78.9 )1.00 13.991(10.145?9.293) p,0.001*241 (56.6 ) 185 (43.4 )175 (37.2 ) 295 (62.8 )1.00 2.196 (1.680?.870) p,0.001*224 (52.6 ) 202 (47.4 )61 (13.0 ) 409 (87.0 )1.00 7.435 (5.348?0.336) p,0.001*Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test was used between healthy controls and patients with oral cancer. * Statistically significant, p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060283.tVEGF-C Gene Polymorphisms in Oral CancerTable 2. Distribution frequency of VEGF-C genotypes in 426 healthy controls and 470 male oral cancer patients.Variable rs3775194 GG GC CC GC+ CC rs11947611 AA AG GG AG+GG rs1485766 CC CA AA CA+AA rs7664413 CC CT TT CT+TT rs2046463 AA AG GG AG+GGControls (N = 426) n ( )Patients (N = 470) n ( )Odds ratio (95 confidence interval)Adjusted odds ratio (95 confidence interval)302 (70.9 ) 114 (26.8 ) 10 (2.3 ) 124 (29.1 )355 (75.5 ) 110 (23.4 ) 5 (1.1 ) 115 (24.5 )1.00 0.821 (0.606,1.112) 0.425 (0.144,1.258) 0.789 (0.587,1.061)1.00 0.792 (0.515,1.219) 0.648 (0.159,2.640) 0.781 (0.514,1.188)180 (42.3 ) 204 (47.9 ) 42 (9.9 ) 246 (57.7 )185 (39.4 ) 227 (48.3 ) 58 (12.3 ) 285 (60.6 )1.00 1.083 (0.819,1.431) 1.344 (0.859,2.101) 1.127 (0.863,1.472)1.00 1.213 (0.817,1.802) 1.375 (0.714,2.649) 1.242 (0.853,1.809)149 (35.0 ) 201 (47.2 ) 76 (17.8 ) 277 (65.0 )158 (33.6 ) 209 (44.5 ) 103 (21.9 ) 312 (66.4 )1.00 0.981 (0.729,1.318) 1.278 (0.882,1.853) 1.062 (0.806,1.400)1.00 0.873 (0.571,1.336) 1.153 (0.672,1.979) 0.946 (0.635,1.411)246 (57.7 ) 163 (38.3 ) 17 (4.0 ) 180 (42.3 )248 (52.8 ) 181 (38.5 ) 41 (8.7 ) 222 (47.2 )1.00 1.101 (0.836,1.451) 2.392 (1.323,4.325)* 1.223 (0.939,1.593)1.00 1.294 (0.864,1.939) 2.541 (1.071,6.027)* 1.422 (0.967,2.092)246 (57.7 ) 163 (38.3 ) 17 (4.0 ) 180 (42.3 )248 (52.8 ) 181 (38.5 ) 41 (8.7 ) 222 (47.2 )1.00 1.101 (0.836,1.451) 2.392 (1.323,4.325)* 1.223 (0.939,1.593)1.00 1.294 (0.864,1.939) 2.541 (1.071,6.027)* 1.422 (0.967,2.092)Odds ratios and with their 95 confidence intervals were estimated by 125-65-5 logistic regression models. Adjusted odds ratios with their 95 confidence intervals were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for age, betel-nut chewing, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption. * Statistically significant, p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060283.trs1485766, rs7664413, and rs2046463 haplotypes in our recruited individuals were analyzed. There were five haplotypes with frequencies of .5 among all cases, the most common haplotype in.Homozygotes who did not chew betel nut 1516647 (Table 3). Similarly, among 461 betel-quid consumers, subjects with VEGF-C polymorphic rs3775194, rs11947611 or rs7664413, genes and who smoked had corresponding risks of 2.695- (95 CI: 1.270,10.750), 8.066- (95 CI: 2.250,28.913), and 18.100-fold (95 CI: 5.427,60.369) of having oral cancer compared to betelquid chewers with the WT gene who did not smoke (Table 4). In light of the above results, we suggest that VEGF-C gene polymorphisms have a strong impact on oral-cancer susceptibility in betel-nut and/or smoking consumers. We further explored the haplotypes to evaluate the combined effect of the five polymorphisms on oral-cancer susceptibility. The distribution frequencies of VEGF-C rs3775194, rs11947611,Table 1. Distributions of demographic characteristics in 426 controls and 470 male patients with oral cancer.Variable Betel nut chewing No Yes Alcohol consumption No Yes Tobacco use No YesControls (N = 426)Patients (N = 470)Odds ratio (95 confidence interval)p value336 (78.9 ) 90 (21.1 )99 (21.1 ) 371 (78.9 )1.00 13.991(10.145?9.293) p,0.001*241 (56.6 ) 185 (43.4 )175 (37.2 ) 295 (62.8 )1.00 2.196 (1.680?.870) p,0.001*224 (52.6 ) 202 (47.4 )61 (13.0 ) 409 (87.0 )1.00 7.435 (5.348?0.336) p,0.001*Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test was used between healthy controls and patients with oral cancer. * Statistically significant, p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060283.tVEGF-C Gene Polymorphisms in Oral CancerTable 2. Distribution frequency of VEGF-C genotypes in 426 healthy controls and 470 male oral cancer patients.Variable rs3775194 GG GC CC GC+ CC rs11947611 AA AG GG AG+GG rs1485766 CC CA AA CA+AA rs7664413 CC CT TT CT+TT rs2046463 AA AG GG AG+GGControls (N = 426) n ( )Patients (N = 470) n ( )Odds ratio (95 confidence interval)Adjusted odds ratio (95 confidence interval)302 (70.9 ) 114 (26.8 ) 10 (2.3 ) 124 (29.1 )355 (75.5 ) 110 (23.4 ) 5 (1.1 ) 115 (24.5 )1.00 0.821 (0.606,1.112) 0.425 (0.144,1.258) 0.789 (0.587,1.061)1.00 0.792 (0.515,1.219) 0.648 (0.159,2.640) 0.781 (0.514,1.188)180 (42.3 ) 204 (47.9 ) 42 (9.9 ) 246 (57.7 )185 (39.4 ) 227 (48.3 ) 58 (12.3 ) 285 (60.6 )1.00 1.083 (0.819,1.431) 1.344 (0.859,2.101) 1.127 (0.863,1.472)1.00 1.213 (0.817,1.802) 1.375 (0.714,2.649) 1.242 (0.853,1.809)149 (35.0 ) 201 (47.2 ) 76 (17.8 ) 277 (65.0 )158 (33.6 ) 209 (44.5 ) 103 (21.9 ) 312 (66.4 )1.00 0.981 (0.729,1.318) 1.278 (0.882,1.853) 1.062 (0.806,1.400)1.00 0.873 (0.571,1.336) 1.153 (0.672,1.979) 0.946 (0.635,1.411)246 (57.7 ) 163 (38.3 ) 17 (4.0 ) 180 (42.3 )248 (52.8 ) 181 (38.5 ) 41 (8.7 ) 222 (47.2 )1.00 1.101 (0.836,1.451) 2.392 (1.323,4.325)* 1.223 (0.939,1.593)1.00 1.294 (0.864,1.939) 2.541 (1.071,6.027)* 1.422 (0.967,2.092)246 (57.7 ) 163 (38.3 ) 17 (4.0 ) 180 (42.3 )248 (52.8 ) 181 (38.5 ) 41 (8.7 ) 222 (47.2 )1.00 1.101 (0.836,1.451) 2.392 (1.323,4.325)* 1.223 (0.939,1.593)1.00 1.294 (0.864,1.939) 2.541 (1.071,6.027)* 1.422 (0.967,2.092)Odds ratios and with their 95 confidence intervals were estimated by logistic regression models. Adjusted odds ratios with their 95 confidence intervals were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for age, betel-nut chewing, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption. * Statistically significant, p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060283.trs1485766, rs7664413, and rs2046463 haplotypes in our recruited individuals were analyzed. There were five haplotypes with frequencies of .5 among all cases, the most common haplotype in.