Cantly between the groups (Figure 2). Death, generally preceded by convulsions, occurred

Cantly between the A196 site groups (Figure 2). Death, generally preceded by convulsions, occurred more frequently in the control group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (62.2 versus 41.3 , respectively, p = 0.074). Additional analysis found that time to onset of DCS symptoms (6.2162.7 min for fluoxetine vs 5.4362.9 min for controls, p = 0.404) and time to death were notBlood Cells (Figure 4)Platelet counts. Following the dive, the platelet count was significantly reduced by 216.3627.6 from baseline in the controls (p = 0.01) whereas the decrease by 21.77635 was not significant in the fluoxetine group (p = 0.974). Leukocyte counts. Following the dive, the leukocyte count was significantly decreased from baseline by 221.8638.8 in the controls (p = 0.025) and by 231.7641.7 in the fluoxetine group (p,0.001), with no statistical difference between groups (p = 0.412). Red cells. Following the dive, the red cell went down by 221.7621.7 from baseline in the controls (p = 0.03) whereas theFigure 1. Flow chart describing the experimental design. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049069.gFluoxetine vs DCSFigure 2. Percents of symptomatic mice suffering from decompression sickness (DCS) within 30 min after surfacing. Histogram in dark grey represents the mice treated with fluoxetine and light grey represents the controls. *denotes p,0.05 between groups. Distribution of symptoms is represented for each group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049069.gdecrease by 210.2630.3 was not significant in the fluoxetine group (p = 0.05).Circulating IL-We found a significant difference of IL-6 between the groups (p = 0.002). As shown in Figure 4, circulating levels of inflammatory cytokine IL-6 were significantly increased by 245.56260 from baseline in the controls (n = 10) whereas IL-6 levels in the fluoxetine group (n = 9) were significantly reduced by 2251.86313 compared with the control group.motor impairment and convulsions suggestive of spinal cord and/ or brain damage, previously used in studies in mice of similar weight [26,27]. The main finding in this study is that mice treated with fluoxetine had lower DCS incidence, as assessed both by behavioral observations and multiple biological markers.Effects of Fluoxetine on Motor ImpairmentWe observed a better neurological recovery in the fluoxetine group with an increased percent of successful suspension tests seen between the first and second grip tests. This 18325633 suggests that fluoxetine could have a neuroprotective effect in neurological DCS, in line with previous studies on cerebral ischemia [19,20].DiscussionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of fluoxetine in a get ITI 007 clinically relevant model of DCS that producesFigure 3. Percents of successful grip tests (suspension time 30 sec) in dark grey for the mice treated with fluoxetine and light grey for the controls. Grip tests were performed in each group to quantify forelimb involvement 15 and 30 min after surfacing. denotes p,0.05 between the groups and *denotes p,0.05 between the paired mice. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049069.gFluoxetine vs DCSFigure 4. Percents of blood cells consumption after decompression from the baseline in dark grey for the mice treated with fluoxetine and light grey for the controls. *denotes a significant difference between pre- and post-decompression. On the right, changes ( ) in circulating cytokine IL-6 levels after decompression from the baseline. denotes a significant difference between groups. *d.Cantly between the groups (Figure 2). Death, generally preceded by convulsions, occurred more frequently in the control group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (62.2 versus 41.3 , respectively, p = 0.074). Additional analysis found that time to onset of DCS symptoms (6.2162.7 min for fluoxetine vs 5.4362.9 min for controls, p = 0.404) and time to death were notBlood Cells (Figure 4)Platelet counts. Following the dive, the platelet count was significantly reduced by 216.3627.6 from baseline in the controls (p = 0.01) whereas the decrease by 21.77635 was not significant in the fluoxetine group (p = 0.974). Leukocyte counts. Following the dive, the leukocyte count was significantly decreased from baseline by 221.8638.8 in the controls (p = 0.025) and by 231.7641.7 in the fluoxetine group (p,0.001), with no statistical difference between groups (p = 0.412). Red cells. Following the dive, the red cell went down by 221.7621.7 from baseline in the controls (p = 0.03) whereas theFigure 1. Flow chart describing the experimental design. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049069.gFluoxetine vs DCSFigure 2. Percents of symptomatic mice suffering from decompression sickness (DCS) within 30 min after surfacing. Histogram in dark grey represents the mice treated with fluoxetine and light grey represents the controls. *denotes p,0.05 between groups. Distribution of symptoms is represented for each group. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049069.gdecrease by 210.2630.3 was not significant in the fluoxetine group (p = 0.05).Circulating IL-We found a significant difference of IL-6 between the groups (p = 0.002). As shown in Figure 4, circulating levels of inflammatory cytokine IL-6 were significantly increased by 245.56260 from baseline in the controls (n = 10) whereas IL-6 levels in the fluoxetine group (n = 9) were significantly reduced by 2251.86313 compared with the control group.motor impairment and convulsions suggestive of spinal cord and/ or brain damage, previously used in studies in mice of similar weight [26,27]. The main finding in this study is that mice treated with fluoxetine had lower DCS incidence, as assessed both by behavioral observations and multiple biological markers.Effects of Fluoxetine on Motor ImpairmentWe observed a better neurological recovery in the fluoxetine group with an increased percent of successful suspension tests seen between the first and second grip tests. This 18325633 suggests that fluoxetine could have a neuroprotective effect in neurological DCS, in line with previous studies on cerebral ischemia [19,20].DiscussionThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of fluoxetine in a clinically relevant model of DCS that producesFigure 3. Percents of successful grip tests (suspension time 30 sec) in dark grey for the mice treated with fluoxetine and light grey for the controls. Grip tests were performed in each group to quantify forelimb involvement 15 and 30 min after surfacing. denotes p,0.05 between the groups and *denotes p,0.05 between the paired mice. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049069.gFluoxetine vs DCSFigure 4. Percents of blood cells consumption after decompression from the baseline in dark grey for the mice treated with fluoxetine and light grey for the controls. *denotes a significant difference between pre- and post-decompression. On the right, changes ( ) in circulating cytokine IL-6 levels after decompression from the baseline. denotes a significant difference between groups. *d.