Ulated by the Cbl-c ubiquitin ligase in breast cancer cells. (A

Ulated by the Cbl-c ubiquitin ligase in breast Ornipressin site cancer cells. (A) AU565Vector and AU565Vav1 were treated with10 mM of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 for four hours or left untreated. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-Vav1 antibody. Anti bcatenin antibody was used as a control for an unstable protein with a short half-life. Anti-actin antibody served as a loading control. (B) The expression of Cbl isoforms (Cbl, Cbl-b and Cbl-c) was analyzed by Real-Time PCR in MCF-7Vector and AU565Vector cells. (C) Lysates of AU565Vav1 cells were incubated with 11967625 bacterial GST fusion proteins expressing the SH2 domain of Vav1 (GST-Vav1SH2) or GFP (GST-GFP), and then immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads. Bound proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels and immunoblotted with anti-Cbl-c or anti-pTyr antibodies. As loading control, total cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-Cbl-c and actin antibodies. (D) Vav1 and Cbl-c expression in 50 breast cancer originated cell lines using the same gene array as in Figure 2A. Red: greater than mean expression, Green: less than expression, Black: mean expression. (E) Cbl-c is silenced in AU565 cells following treatment with Cbl-c shRNA. Cells were infected with viral vectors containing shRNA for Cbl-c (shCbl-c 273) or control validated (shControl). cDNA was subjected to real time PCR analysis using primers against Cbl-c, Cbl and Cbl-b. GAPDH was used as a control. (F) Lysates from AU565 cells infected with shCbl-c 273 or control shScrambled were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-Vav1 antibody. As a control for Vav1 expression, lysates from H358 lung cancer cells infected with shVav1 or shControl were used. Anti-actin was used as loading control. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054321.g(Polyplus, CA, USA). 50-14-6 site transfected cells were selected using 7 mg/ ml blasticidine (Invitrogen, NY, USA). For luciferase assay, AU565 cells were transiently transfected with pGL3-Vav1 or pGL3 vector using the jetPEIH transfection reagent.Luciferase Reporter AssayLuciferase reporter assay was performed with Dual- Luciferase Reporter System (Promega, USA) using a Luminometer Mithras (Berthold 1655472 Technologies, Germany) as described [22].Vav1 in Breast CancerQuantitative Real-time PCRDetection of Vav1 on cDNAs (see above) was performed using cyber green PCR master mix (Tamar, Jerusalem, Israel) and the required primers (Table S1). Analysis was performed using the ABI Prism 7300 real-time PCR technology (Applied Biosystems, CA). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.Immunoprecipitation and ImmunoblottingCell lysis, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting procedures were performed as described [7] by using the antibodies outlined in Table S2.positive, 27 were progesterone receptor (PR) positive (including 15 that were both ER and PR positive) and 50 were HER2 positive. Immunohistochemical analysis against Vav1 was performed, and Vav1 staining was quantified using an automated robotic image analysis system. Five lobular invasive carcinoma samples were excluded due to small case number. Vav1 was expressed at varying intensities in 40 of the 65 remaining tumors (62 ) (Fig. 1A and Table S3) and was correlated positively with expression of ER and PR but not with HER2 expression (Fig. 1B).Expression of Vav1 Protein in Breast Cancer Cell Lines is Regulated by Cbl-c Ubiquitin LigaseWe determined the relative expression levels of Vav1 in a series of 50 breast cancer cell lines using data from a gene expressio.Ulated by the Cbl-c ubiquitin ligase in breast cancer cells. (A) AU565Vector and AU565Vav1 were treated with10 mM of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 for four hours or left untreated. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-Vav1 antibody. Anti bcatenin antibody was used as a control for an unstable protein with a short half-life. Anti-actin antibody served as a loading control. (B) The expression of Cbl isoforms (Cbl, Cbl-b and Cbl-c) was analyzed by Real-Time PCR in MCF-7Vector and AU565Vector cells. (C) Lysates of AU565Vav1 cells were incubated with 11967625 bacterial GST fusion proteins expressing the SH2 domain of Vav1 (GST-Vav1SH2) or GFP (GST-GFP), and then immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose beads. Bound proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels and immunoblotted with anti-Cbl-c or anti-pTyr antibodies. As loading control, total cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-Cbl-c and actin antibodies. (D) Vav1 and Cbl-c expression in 50 breast cancer originated cell lines using the same gene array as in Figure 2A. Red: greater than mean expression, Green: less than expression, Black: mean expression. (E) Cbl-c is silenced in AU565 cells following treatment with Cbl-c shRNA. Cells were infected with viral vectors containing shRNA for Cbl-c (shCbl-c 273) or control validated (shControl). cDNA was subjected to real time PCR analysis using primers against Cbl-c, Cbl and Cbl-b. GAPDH was used as a control. (F) Lysates from AU565 cells infected with shCbl-c 273 or control shScrambled were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-Vav1 antibody. As a control for Vav1 expression, lysates from H358 lung cancer cells infected with shVav1 or shControl were used. Anti-actin was used as loading control. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054321.g(Polyplus, CA, USA). Transfected cells were selected using 7 mg/ ml blasticidine (Invitrogen, NY, USA). For luciferase assay, AU565 cells were transiently transfected with pGL3-Vav1 or pGL3 vector using the jetPEIH transfection reagent.Luciferase Reporter AssayLuciferase reporter assay was performed with Dual- Luciferase Reporter System (Promega, USA) using a Luminometer Mithras (Berthold 1655472 Technologies, Germany) as described [22].Vav1 in Breast CancerQuantitative Real-time PCRDetection of Vav1 on cDNAs (see above) was performed using cyber green PCR master mix (Tamar, Jerusalem, Israel) and the required primers (Table S1). Analysis was performed using the ABI Prism 7300 real-time PCR technology (Applied Biosystems, CA). Three independent experiments were performed in triplicates.Immunoprecipitation and ImmunoblottingCell lysis, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting procedures were performed as described [7] by using the antibodies outlined in Table S2.positive, 27 were progesterone receptor (PR) positive (including 15 that were both ER and PR positive) and 50 were HER2 positive. Immunohistochemical analysis against Vav1 was performed, and Vav1 staining was quantified using an automated robotic image analysis system. Five lobular invasive carcinoma samples were excluded due to small case number. Vav1 was expressed at varying intensities in 40 of the 65 remaining tumors (62 ) (Fig. 1A and Table S3) and was correlated positively with expression of ER and PR but not with HER2 expression (Fig. 1B).Expression of Vav1 Protein in Breast Cancer Cell Lines is Regulated by Cbl-c Ubiquitin LigaseWe determined the relative expression levels of Vav1 in a series of 50 breast cancer cell lines using data from a gene expressio.