Ws are lacking. The aim of this study is always to identify the danger of newonset diabetes mellitus (NODM) immediately after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) performed for benign and malignant ailments. Aims Procedures: A systematic literature search was performed up to October st in PubMed,Embase (Ovid) and also the Cochrane Library in accordance with all the Preferred Reporting Things for Systematic Testimonials and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All studies reporting on the incidence of NODM following PD for benign or (pre)malignant pancreatic or periampullary tumors have been incorporated. Research of sufferers undergoing PD for chronic pancreatitis were excluded. Main outcome was incidence of NODM. Results: On the research identified,research ( individuals) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Individuals underwent PD for cancer (n),benign disease (n),or neoplasm from unclear origin (n). The weighted mean percentage of NODM was . . Only research,comprising sufferers with NODM,reported the incidence of insulindependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The weighted mean postPD percentage of IDDM among these sufferers with NODM was . . Conclusion: Incidence of NODM following PD for pancreatic or periampullary tumors is . . Routine postoperative screening for NODM appears advisable. Far more study in to the danger of IDDM following PD is needed. Disclosure of Interest: None declaredP Results OF ENDOSCOPIC DILATION ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOTIC STENOSISOFP PERITONEAL IRRIGATION Will not Minimize Price OF POSTOPERATIVE FORMATION OF INTRAABDOMINAL ABSCESS Immediately after PERFORATED APPENDECTOMY S. Groen,L. de Nes,H. Barton,S. Donkervoort,S. Festen,on behalf of Dirty Belly Operating Group Surgery,Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis,AmsterdamNetherlands,Amsterdam,Netherlands,Surgery,Humanitas Investigation Hospital,Milano,Italy Speak to E-mail Address: syl.groengmail Introduction: Annually ,appendectomies are performed within the Netherlands. Even though the general price of postoperative intraabdominal abscess (PIAA) formation is Trans-(±)-ACP web pubmed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25782058 small,there is a prospective significant impact on mortality,morbidity,duration of hospitaladmission and expenses. Biggest threat in building PIAA is soon after perforated appendicitis Peritonealirrigation in the course of surgery is regularly applied as preventive procedure,having said that literature is lacking supporting evidence. The only accessible prospective study describes an increase of abscessformation within a pediatric studygroup. Principal objective of our study was to determine the efficacy of peritonealirrigation in perforated appendicitis on PIAA in adults. The maximum diameter of mm was achieved in individuals (using a median of sessions per patient (range: sessions per patient). There wereUnited European Gastroenterology Journal (S) linked with a longer hospitaladmission,on an typical of . days (OR BI . P.). Conclusion: PeritonealIrrigation during surgery in perforated appendicitis doesn’t substantially minimize the price PIAA formation within this retrospective study and likely increases the price of this complication. Additionally,sufferers within the irrigation group have been admitted considerably longer. Disclosure of Interest: None declaredA sufferers had been inpatients,unrelated to their IBD,and also a diagnosis of VTEAT was confirmed inside days of admission. sufferers have been diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and with pulmonary embolism (PE). The remaining four had portal vein thrombosis,prevalent femoral artery occlusion,femoral artery embolus and superficial femoral artery occlusion. Three patients were diagnosed with each DVT and PE in the similar admi.