Retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Prevention techniques targeting danger factors may be important to lower the price of postERCP pancreatitis. Nonetheless,the threat factors for postERCP pancreatitis (PEP) are nevertheless debated. Aims Strategies Aim: This systematic evaluation ananalysis was GSK6853 manufacturer performed to ascertain the prevalence of PEP and to identify its danger aspects. Strategies: We performed a retrospective study within a single center by reviewing all consecutive cases in which ERCP was performed amongst January and January . The existence of pancreatitis prior to the process was an exclusion criteria. All patients remained inside the hospital for at the very least hours soon after the procedure to monitor them for clinical manifestations of pancreatitis. Serum amylase and lipase levels had been measured at and hours (the following morning) immediately after ERCP. We evaluated variables,which includes patientrelated elements and procedure associated aspects that could possibly be analyzed in detail determined by information in the sufferers charts.United European Gastroenterology Journal (S) Results: A total of sufferers were integrated in our study.Therapeutic ERCP had been performed in all instances. of instances have been for common bile duct stones and PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24752908 in of situations for biliary stent . Thirty 5 patients developed PEP using a prevalence of . . On univariate analysis,precut sphincterotomy (p) and pancreatic duct cannulation (p) were identified to become significantly related with PEP. On multivariate evaluation,important danger variables have been: at the very least two pancreatic duct injections (p) and age younger than years (p). Conclusion: History of acute pancreatitis,precut sphincterotomy and pancreatic duct cannulation have been all identified as independent danger things for PEP. Disclosure of Interest: None declaredA P EFFICACY OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN PANCREATIC FISTULAS E. RodriguesPinto,P. Pereira,P. MoutinhoRibeiro,A. Ribeiro,J. A. Sarmento,F. VilasBoas,G. Macedo Gastroenterology,Centro Hospitalar Sa Joa o,oPorto,Portugal o Contact E mail Address: edu.gil.pintogmail Introduction: Pancreatic fistulas (PF) might result from surgical resection,pancreatic trauma or chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) enables a more quickly resolution of PF,by performing pancreatic sphincterotomy (S) andor placement of pancreatic stents (PS) with Fr. Aims Techniques: Assess the part of ERCP within the therapy of PF. Crosssectional study of sufferers referred for ERCP resulting from PF. Benefits: Fifteen patients ( males) had PF in pancreatogram,within the cephalic portion,inside the neck,inside the physique and within the tail. Ten patients had undergone preceding surgery,together with the remaining becoming secondary to pancreatitis (n; or traumatic transection (n; Six on the operated sufferers had splenectomy. Median time to ERCP was days. Fourteen sufferers placed PS and performed S. Eleven individuals resolved PF endoscopically,days ( right after ERCP; patient repeated ERCP,using the remaining requiring surgery. Splenectomy was related with endoscopic failure ( vs ,p.). PS cm andor Fr had been associated having a trend towards greater endoscopic resolution,respectively. vs . (p.) and vs . (p.). Time till endoscopic resolution was have a tendency shorter when surgical fistulas ( days vs days,p.),when PS with Fr ( days vs days,p.) or cm ( days vs days,p.). Conclusion: ERCP with PS and S is efficient in of patients with PF. PS cm or Fr could possibly be a lot more successful. Related splenectomy is linked with endoscopic resolution failure. Disclosure of Interest: None declared.