Share this post on:

) (92.two) (7.eight) (54.3) (45.7) (23.) (76.9) (70.7) (29.3) (97.) (2.9) (76.five) (23.five) (84.0) (six.0) (four.four, six.6) (six.3, 8.7)Pvalue was calculated making use of chisquared tests. Pvalue was calculated working with MannWhitney
) (92.two) (7.eight) (54.three) (45.7) (23.) (76.9) (70.7) (29.3) (97.) (2.9) (76.5) (23.5) (84.0) (six.0) (four.4, six.six) (6.3, eight.7)Pvalue was calculated applying chisquared tests. Pvalue was calculated employing MannWhitney U tests.https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392.tTable 2. Rotated issue loadings (varimax rotation). PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114510 Males Aspect Variables Clubs for the elderly Volunteer activities Neighborhood events Hobby Friendship Communication with family members and good friends https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392.t002 neighborhood involvement 0.698 0.80 0.742 0.three 0.0 0.022 Factor two person connection 0.06 0.20 0.25 0.60 0.747 0.77 Factor community involvement 0.738 0.606 0.79 0.027 0.96 0.022 Ladies Issue 2 individual relationship 0.083 0.354 0.080 0.746 0.569 0.PLOS 1 https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392 April 7,six SGI-7079 site social participation and psychological distress in older adultsTable three. Association of social participation level with psychological distress in communitydwelling older adults by age group. Model a Males Community involvement total 659 years 704 years Individual connection total 659 years 704 years Females Community involvement total 659 years 704 years Individual connection total 659 years 704 yearsa bModel 2 b pvalue 0.680 0.86 0.856 0.06 0.338 0.087 0.359 0.434 0.699 0.99 0.259 0.52 0.03 0.04 0.007 0.050 0.035 0.060 0.082 0.045 0.087 0.03 0.003 0.04 95 CI 0.44 0.98 0.242 0.276 0.288 0.47 0.025 0.97 0.26 0.237 0.268 0.385 0.89 0.247 0.267 0.077 0.60 0.56 0.392 0.423 0.488 0.78 0.255 0.33 pvalue 0.790 0.826 0.923 0.267 0.574 0.370 0.084 0.472 0.247 0.428 0.559 0.738 0.033 0.020 0.043 0.053 0.09 0.083 0.099 0.048 0.2 0.029 0.007 0.Model three c 95 CI 0.9 0.20 0.98 0.29 0.265 0.492 0.003 0.26 0.088 0.292 0.307 0.43 0.237 0.270 0.360 0.084 0.98 0.34 0.443 0.457 0.555 0.55 0.273 0.30 pvalue 0.58 0.775 0.567 0.277 0.775 0.26 0.047 0.48 0.54 0.548 0.809 0.95 CI 0.27 0.254 0.304 0.360 0.34 0.562 0.28 0.220 0.274 0.404 0.49 0.529 0.4 0.23 0.253 0.008 0.7 0.038 0.352 0.five 0.408 0.085 0.33 0.0.02 0.02 0.04 0.089 0.062 0.2 0.050 0.057 0.032 0.067 0.079 0.Model : Adjusted for age, area (Bunkyo Fuchu Oyama), living arrangement (with others alone), working (yes no) Model two: Adjusted for age, location (Bunkyo Fuchu Oyama), living arrangement (with other folks alone), operating (yes no), BMI, physical functioning (fantastic undesirable),smoking (yes no), drinking (yes no)cModel 3: Adjusted for age, area (Bunkyo Fuchu Oyama), living arrangement (with others alone), working (yes no), BMI, physical functioning (very good undesirable), smoking (yes no), drinking (yes no), neighborhood involvement or individual relationship https:doi.org0.37journal.pone.075392.tTable 4. Association of social participation level with psychological distress in communitydwelling older adults by living arrangement. Model a Males Neighborhood involvement living with others living alone Individual relationship living with other folks living alone Women Neighborhood involvement living with other individuals living alone Individual partnership living with other individuals living alonea b cModel 2 b pvalue 0.784 0.853 0.08 0.699 0.597 0.four 0.002 0.265 0.007 0.055 0.048 0.086 0.065 0.200 0.078 0.258 95 CI 0.60 0.433 0.283 0.373 0.080 0.99 0.394 0.052 0.85 0.622 0.088 0.656 0.357 .300 0.043 .396 pvalue 0.886 0.76 0.300 0.577 0.23 0.46 0.6 0.035 0.024 0.06 0.046 0.078 0.0 0.85 0.02 0.Model three c 95 CI 0.40 0.598 0.288 0.484 0.002 0.22 0.473 0.033 0.228 0.653 0.03 0.739 0.468 .229 0.009 .363 pvalue 0.640 0.928 0.352 0.67 0.048 0.62 0.059 0.95 CI 0.208 0.545 0.420 0.47 0.232 0.545 0.

Share this post on: