Github.commjwestgatesppairs).Figure 1. Association diagram for remnant web pages (795 surveys); colored circles represent species (reference PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345903 numbers identified in Table 2): red 75 presence, orange 505 , light brown 250 , yellow 105 , green 3.60 , blue 3.6 ; red arrows represent indication (thickness proportional to odds ratio) of 1 species by an additional (colored magenta if odds ratio is infinite); blue arrows similarly represent contraindication (colored black if odds ratio is 0).Pollock et al. 2014) and none where the links inside the network represent odds ratios.Similarity coefficientsSteele et al. (2011) constructed networks with nodes representing the abundance of marine bacteria, archaea, and protists, and measurements from the marine atmosphere. The edges represent correlations, distinguishing in between good and unfavorable, and also amongst lagged and unlagged correlations over time. The correlations are formed from normalized ranked information and are known as neighborhood similarity coefficients, so aren’t readily interpretable with regards to modifications in species presence; furthermore, there’s no notion of direction of an association, since correlations are symmetric.Comparison with existing methodsNetwork diagrams are made use of in several applications to show relationships between a set of units (Proulx et al. 2005; Mersch et al. 2013) and are employed in ecology especially to display interactions in between plants and their pollinators (Bascompte and Jordano 2007), and predators and prey (Dexter et al. 2013). However, we have observed couple of examples where the network represents co-occurrence within a taxonomic group (despite the fact that seeMultivariate logistic regressionOvaskainen et al. (2010) Neuromedin N utilised multivariate logistic regression to investigate interactions between fungal species, quantifying them when it comes to correlations around the logistic scale. The estimates were displayed within a grid, with the size of a symbol in each cell representing the size on the correlation, applying colour to distinguish positive from unfavorable correlation. Again, the correlations present little informa-2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley Sons Ltd.Species Pairwise Association AnalysisP. W. Lane et al.Table 2. Species present in no less than 10 of surveys and presence in remnants and plantings. Species common name Australian magpie Australian raven Black-faced cuckoo-shrike Brown treecreeper Cockatiel Popular bronzewing Widespread starling Crested pigeon Crested shrike-tit Crimson rosella Dusky woodswallow Eastern rosella Galah Grey butcher-bird Grey shrikethrush Jacky winter Laughing kookaburra Tiny friarbird Magpie-lark Noisy miner Peaceful dove Pied butcher-bird Red wattlebird Red-rumped parrot Restless flycatcher Rufous songlark Rufous whistler Sacred kingfisher Striated pardalote Excellent fairy-wren Excellent parrot Welcome swallow White-browed woodswallow Species scientific name Cracticus tibicen Corvus coronoides Coracina novaehollandiae Climacteris picumnus Nymphicus hollandicus Phaps chalcoptera Sturnus vulgaris Ocyphaps lophotes Falcunculus frontatus Platycercus elegans Artamus cyanopterus Platycercus eximius Eolophus roseicapillus Cracticus torquatus Colluricincla harmonica Microeca fascinans Dacelo novaeguineae Philemon citreogularis Grallina cyanoleuca Manorina melanocephala Geopelia striata Cracticus nigrogularis Anthochaera carunculata Psephotus haematonotus Myiagra inquieta Cincloramphus mathewsi Pachycephala rufiventris Todiramphus sanctus Pardalotus striatus.